Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

April 04 2016


Gap Article: University Gap Funding: Mind the space

University Gap Funding: Mind the visible difference

With all of eyes on the economy, policymakers are quick to invoke the buzzwords of the day, like �innovation�, �economic development�, and �job creation�, to spell out the beneficial impact of commercializing early on technology, often from research universities. Recently though, it would appear that special interests, without workable solutions, are grabbing headlines and helping to craft policy in line with the suggestion that research universities are going to do little to support this chance.

For those who have accepted this info as fact, you'll understandably think the system has neglected its duty, has failed, which is will need a revolutionary fix; however, with minimal investigation, you will notice that universities have lead inside the progression of tactics and programs that address critical barriers to early on commercialization, often ahead of other private and public entities.

One such example, is the growth and development of gap funding programs to deal with the capital shortage that exists for early-stage technologies and start-ups.

So what is gap funding? How can gap funding correspond with other kinds of innovation capital? And exactly what is the impact of gap funding (why wouldn't you care)?

What is Gap Funding (A Better Definition)?

The �gap� in gap funding is the term for a huge shortage in capital as well as other commercialization support to transition early-stage technology towards the marketplace. To address this need, many research universities either directly manage or partner with gov departments, early on investors, or corporations to make translational research, evidence of concept, and pre/seed-stage gap funds that really help in evaluating, de-risking, or commercializing technologies and start-ups.

Defining this �gap� too broadly (e.g. �Valley of Death� or �between basic research and also the market�) oversimplifies the reasons with the situation and clouds the direction to resolution. Frankly, it could be grounds why this kind of funding is less covered in mainstream press, and fewer understood by the public. To ease this tension, I propose which enable it to demonstrate an even more actionable, segmented system determined by fund observations.

Translational Research
Translational Research gap funds enter after traditional sources of acquisition of preliminary research cease, and secure the promising projects that require additional applied development. The greatest goal is to buy we have to a degree where it is usually assessed for commercial potential, or aligned with the priorities of an external partner willing to enjoy the technology further

Evidence of Concept
Evidence Concept (POC) gap funds evaluate commercial potential, demonstrate the price of we have, and usually de-risk it (or perception of risk) for commercial partners or investors. By developing the commercial groundwork, including prototypes, IP/competitive landscaping, and application evaluation, these funds try to identify and secure a path to commercialization (license to existing company or spin-out). POC gap funds also behave as an operation filter by identifying weakness inside the technology for additional development, or by deciding never to pursue we've got the technology which saves often larger resource requirements later in the act (a typical recommendation in many new service development literature). From my research, this can be the most widely-utilized, and necessary gap fund type

Start-up Formation
This emerging gap fund type aids in earlier formational steps of recent company creation - often prior to it being a legal entity. Business Formation funds is visible like a start-up-focused extension of proof of concept funding (post route-to-market decision) that develops the business enterprise putting on we have through general market trends, product development, business development, management, space, and equipment

Start-up Growth
As scalability and growth become major objectives, some study universities have formulated, spun out, or partnered with seed funds and accelerators, both public (government) and personal (corporations, investors), to fill a void during the early stage capital. The principle objective of Business Growth funds is always to scale a stylish business that produces jobs, makes a risk-worthy return on investment, and attracts capital by leveraging other external investors

To sum up, adopting this segmented method of gap funding results in a model that is actionable, relatable, and customizable in this it:

 Aligns with well known technology product development processes
 Allows for a person approach that's based on the specific resource needs and existing culture with the funding institution
 Creates a system that is identifiable by stakeholders of early-stage innovation (private and non-private), and supplies them a chance to identify their role as a partner in the operation

What makes gap funding connect with other styles of innovation capital?

The most popular type of early stage technology and start-up funding - prevalent running a business books and policy reports - depicts government-funded research magically transitioning to application by way of a license to an existing company or start-up. The start-ups are supported of their early development by government grants, bootstrapping, and thru angel or venture capital investment while they work towards profit, growth and liquidity.

This view is neat and places and emphasis on more traditional types of early stage capital; however, it's also misleading and shifts the main objective downstream. It ignores a significant area of the realities of early stage technology development-especially people that are realized by those involved in commercializing university research (longer to-market timelines, resource intensive).

On this view, gap funding as well as other emerging and disruptive sources of early stage capital in many cases are overlooked and under resourced because they're literally not within the picture; therefore, I produce an updated version in the early stage funding landscape-one that positions gap funding and in addition includes the current status of other forms of traditional, emerging, and disruptive reasons for initial phase capital and support

Each of these options for early on capital are vital to transitioning university and also other early-stage technology towards the marketplace; but, there are several inherent conflicts that inhibit remarkable ability to deliver reliable and well-positioned assistance noisy . stages of technology and start-up development. A few of these weaknesses include:

 Aversion or lack of ability to fund translational research, evidence of concept, and other initial phases of start-up development
 Structured to create larger investments in fewer deals
 Focus on investment sectors that may not address technology with longer development timelines, resource intensity, and IP/regulatory hurdles
 Motivations (incentives towards near term returns) and constraints that will limit remarkable ability to just accept the chance of early on innovation

An excellent technique to address this capital shortage is always to the) attract retreating forms of early stage capital and commercial partners into the �gap�, or b) invest into appliances are better positioned to fund the �gap�. The most effective strategy is to aid a solution, like gap funding, that accomplishes both.

Research universities and partners have created gap funding being a capital and innovation support mechanism that is ideally positioned to handle the critical elements of transitioning university technology and start-ups, as well as attracting additional capital and third-party interest.

As it might not yet hold the prestige of other forms of early stage capital, gap funding is proving to be a disruptive approach that is certainly better aligned with and possesses the capability to support technology and start-up increase in the early stages through:

 Focus on translational research, proof of concept, and start-up development
 Targeted smaller grants and investments per project, that enable to technology or start-up to be more adaptive to development �pivots�
 Directed to finance university projects, often in several technology areas with varying to-market requirements
 Positioned in a nexus of college, students, and business networks
 Mission-driven to innovate, educate, and job create

Don't be the product, buy the product!